IQBAL AND PAKISTAN MOVEMENT
Although his main
interests were scholarly, Iqbal was not unconcerned with the political situation of the,
country and the political fortunes of the Muslim community of India. Already in 1908,
while in England, he had been chosen as a member of the executive council of the
newly-established British branch of the Indian Muslim League. In 1931 and 1932 he
represented the Muslims of India in the Round Table Conferences held in England to discuss
the issue of the political future of India. And in a 1930 lecture Iqbal suggested the
creation of a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. Iqbal died (1938) before the
creation of Pakistan (1947), but it was his teaching that "spiritually ... has been
the chief force behind the creation of Pakistan."
Iqbal joined the London branch of the All India Muslim League while he
was studying Law and Philosophy in England. It was in London when he had a mystical
experience. The ghazal containing those divinations is the only one whose year and month
of composition is expressly mentioned. It is March 1907. No other ghazal, before or after
it has been given such importance. Some verses of that ghazal are:
Your civilization will commit suicide with its
own daggers.
A nest built on a frail bough cannot be
durable.
own daggers.
A nest built on a frail bough cannot be
durable.
The caravan of feeble ants will take the rose
petal for a boat
And inspite of all blasts of waves, it shall cross
the river.
petal for a boat
And inspite of all blasts of waves, it shall cross
the river.
I will take out may worn-out caravan in the
pitch darkness of night.
My sighs will emit sparks and my breath will
produce flames.
pitch darkness of night.
My sighs will emit sparks and my breath will
produce flames.
For Iqbal it was a divinely inspired insight. He disclosed this to his
listeners in December 1931, when he was invited to Cambridge to address the students.
Iqbal was in London, participating in the Second Round Table Conference in 1931. At
Cambridge, he referred to what he had proclaimed in 1906:
I would like to offer a few pieces of advice to the youngmen who are
at present studying at Cambridge ...... I advise you to guard against atheism and
materialism. The biggest blunder made by Europe was the separation of Church and State.
This deprived their culture of moral soul and diverted it to the atheistic materialism. I
had twenty-five years ago seen through the drawbacks of this civilization and therefore
had made some prophecies. They had been delivered by my tongue although I did not quite
understand them. This happened in 1907..... After six or seven years, my prophecies came
true, word by word. The European war of 1914 was an outcome of the aforesaid mistakes made
by the European nations in the separation of the Church and the State.
Building upon Sir Sayyid Ahmed's two-nation theory, absorbing the
teaching of Shibli, Ameer Ali, Hasrat Mohani and other great Indian Muslim thinkers and
politicians, listening to Hindu and British voices, and watching the fermenting Indian
scene closely for approximately 60 years, he knew and ultimately convinced his people and
their leaders, particularly Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah that:
"We both are exiles in this land. Both longing for
our dear home's sight!"
our dear home's sight!"
"That dear home is Pakistan, on which he harpened like a
flute-player, but whose birth he did not witness."
Iqbal
and Politics
These thoughts crystallised at Allahabad Session (December, 1930) of the All India Muslim League, when Iqbal in the Presidential Address, forwarded the idea of a Muslim State in India:
These thoughts crystallised at Allahabad Session (December, 1930) of the All India Muslim League, when Iqbal in the Presidential Address, forwarded the idea of a Muslim State in India:
I would like to see the Punjab, North-West Frontier Provinces, Sind
and Baluchistan into a single State. Self-Government within the British Empire or without
the British Empire. The formation of the consolidated North-West Indian Muslim State
appears to be the final destiny of the Muslims, at least of the North-West India.
The seed sown, the idea began to evolve and take root. It soon assumed
the shape of Muslim state or states in the western and eastern Muslim majority zones as is
obvious from the following lines of Iqbal's letter, of June 21, 1937, to the Quaid-i Azam,
only ten months before the former's death:
A separate federation of Muslim Provinces, reformed on the lines I
have suggested above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save
Muslims from the domination of Non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India
and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations
in India and outside India are.
There are some critics of Allama Iqbal who assume that after delivering
the Allahbad Address he had slept over the idea of a Muslim State. Nothing is farther from
the truth. The idea remained always alive in his mind. It had naturally to mature and
hence, had to take time. He was sure that the Muslims of sub-continent were going to
achieve an independent homeland for themselves. On 21st March, 1932, Allama Iqbal
delivered the Presidential address at Lahore at the annual session of the All-India Muslim
Conference. In that address too he stressed his view regarding nationalism in India and
commented on the plight of the Muslims under the circumstances prevailing in the
sub-continent. Having attended the Second Round Table Conference in September, 1931 in
London, he was keenly aware of the deep-seated Hindu and Sikh prejudice and
unaccommodating attitude. He had observed the mind of the British Government. Hence he
reiterated his apprehensions and suggested safeguards in respect of the Indian Muslims:
In so far then as the fundamentals of our policy are concerned, I
have got nothing fresh to offer. Regarding these I have already expressed my views in my
address to the All India Muslim League. In the present address I propose, among other
things, to help you, in the first place, in arriving at a correct view of the situation as
it emerged from a rather hesitating behavior of our delegation the final stages of the
Round-Table Conference. In the second place, I shall try, according to my lights to show
how far it is desirable to construct a fresh policy now that the Premier's announcement at
the last London Conference has again necessitated a careful survey of the whole situation.
It must be kept in mind that since Maulana Muhammad Ali had died in
Jan. 1931 and Quaid-i Azam had stayed behind in London, the responsibility of providing a
proper lead to the Indian Muslims had fallen on him alone. He had to assume the role of a
jealous guardian of his nation till Quaid-i Azam returned to the sub-continent in 1935.
The League and the Muslim Conference had become the play-thing of
petty leaders, who would not resign office, even after a vote of non-confidence! And, of
course, they had no organization in the provinces and no influence with the masses.
During the Third Round-Table Conference, Iqbal was invited by the
London National League where he addressed an audience which included among others, foreign
diplomats, members of the House of Commons, Members of the House of Lords and Muslim
members of the R.T.C. delegation. In that gathering he dilated upon the situation of the
Indian Muslims. He explained why he wanted the communal settlement first and then the
constitutional reforms. He stressed the need for provincial autonomy because autonomy gave
the Muslim majority provinces some power to safeguard their rights, cultural traditions
and religion. Under the central Government the Muslims were bound to lose their cultural
and religious entity at the hands of the overwhelming Hindu majority. He referred to what
he had said at Allahabad in 1930 and reiterated his belief that before long people were
bound to come round to his viewpoint based on cogent reason.
In his dialogue with Dr. Ambedkar Allama Iqbal expressed his desire to
see Indian provinces as autonomous units under the direct control of the British
Government and with no central Indian Government. He envisaged autonomous Muslim Provinces
in India. Under one Indian union he feared for Muslims, who would suffer in many respects
especially with regard to their existentially separate entity as Muslims.
Allama Iqbal's statement explaining the attitude of Muslim delegates to
the Round-Table Conference issued in December, 1933 was a rejoinder to Jawahar Lal Nehru's
statement. Nehru had said that the attitude of the Muslim delegation was based on
"reactionarism." Iqbal concluded his rejoinder with:
In conclusion I must put a straight question to punadi Jawhar Lal,
how is India's problem to be solved if the majority community will neither concede the
minimum safeguards necessary for the protection of a minority of 80 million people, nor
accept the award of a third party; but continue to talk of a kind of nationalism which
works out only to its own benefit? This position can admit of only two alternatives.
Either the Indian majority community will have to accept for itself the permanent position
of an agent of British imperialism in the East, or the country will have to be
redistributed on a basis of religious, historical and cultural affinities so as to do away
with the question of electorates and the communal problem in its present form.
Allama Iqbal's apprehensions were borne out by the Hindu Congress
ministries established in Hindu majority province under the Act of 1935. Muslims in those
provinces were given dastardly treatment. This deplorable phenomenon added to Allama
Iqbal's misgivings regarding the future of Indian Muslims in case India remained united.
In his letters to the Quaid-i Azam written in 1936 and in 1937 he referred to an
independent Muslim State comprising North-Western and Eastern Muslim majority zones. Now
it was not only the North-Western zones alluded to in the Allahabad Address.
There are some within Pakistan and without, who insist that Allama
Iqbal never meant a sovereign Muslim country outside India. Rather he desired a Muslim
State within the Indian Union. A State within a State. This is absolutely wrong. What he
meant was understood very vividly by his Muslim compatriots as well as the non-Muslims.
Why Nehru and others had then tried to show that the idea of Muslim nationalism had no
basis at all. Nehru stated:
This idea of a Muslim nation is the figment of a few imaginations
only, and, but for the publicity given to it by the Press few people would have heard of
it. And even if many people believed in it, it would still vanish at the touch of reality.
Iqbal
and the Quaid-i Azam
Who could understand Allama Iqbal better than the Quaid-i Azam himself, who was his awaited "Guide of the Era"? The Quaid-i Azam in the Introduction to Allama Iqbal's letters addressed to him, admitted that he had agreed with Allama Iqbal regarding a State for Indian Muslims before the latters death in April, 1938. The Quaid stated:
Who could understand Allama Iqbal better than the Quaid-i Azam himself, who was his awaited "Guide of the Era"? The Quaid-i Azam in the Introduction to Allama Iqbal's letters addressed to him, admitted that he had agreed with Allama Iqbal regarding a State for Indian Muslims before the latters death in April, 1938. The Quaid stated:
His views were substantially in consonance with my own and had
finally led me to the same conclusions as a result of careful examination and study of the
constitutional problems facing India and found expression in due course in the united will
of Muslim India as adumbrated in the Lahore Resolution of the All-India Muslim League
popularly known as the "Pakistan Resolution" passed on 23rd March, 1940.
Furthermore, it was Allama Iqbal who called upon Quaid-i Azam Muhammad
Ali Jinnah to lead the Muslims of India to their cherished goal. He preferred the Quaid to
other more experienced Muslim leaders such as Sir Aga Khan, Maulana Hasrat Mohani, Nawab
Muhammad Isma il Khan, Maulana Shaukat Ali, Nawab Hamid Ullah Khan of Bhopal, Sir Ali
Imam, Maulvi Tameez ud-Din Khan, Maulana Abul Kalam, Allama al-Mashriqi and others. But
Allama Iqbal had his own reasons. He had found his "Khizr-i Rah", the veiled
guide in Quaid-i Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah who was destined to lead the Indian branch of
the Muslim Ummah to their goal of freedom. Allama Iqbal stated:
I know you are a busy man but I do hope you won't mind my writing to
you often, as you are the only Muslim in India today to whom the community has right to
look up for safe guidance through the storm which is coming to North-West India, and
perhaps to the whole of India.
Similar sentiments were expressed by him about three months before his
death. Sayyid Nazir Niazi in his book Iqbal Ke Huzur, has stated that the future of
the Indian Muslims was being discussed and a tenor of pessimism was visible from what his
friends said. At this Allama Iqbal observed:
There is only one way out. Muslim should strengthen Jinnah's hands.
They should join the Muslim League. Indian question, as is now being solved, can be
countered by our united front against both the Hindus and the English. Without it our
demands are not going to be accepted. People say our demands smack of communalism. This is
sheer propaganda. These demands relate to the defence of our national existence.
He
continued:
The united front can be formed under the leadership of the Muslim
League. And the Muslim League can succeed only on account of Jinnah. Now none but Jinnah
is capable of leading the Muslims.
Matlub ul-Hasan Sayyid stated that after the Lahore Resolution was
passed on March 23, 1940, the Quaid-i Azam said to him:
Iqbal is no more amongst us, but had he been alive he would have
been happy to know that we did exactly what he wanted us to do.
But the matter does not end here. Allama Iqbal in his letter of March
29, 1937 to the Quaid-i Azam had said:
While we are ready to cooperate with other progressive parties in
the country, we must not ignore the fact that the whole future of Islam as a moral and
political force in Asia rests very largely on a complete organization of Indian Muslims.
According to Allama Iqbal the future of Islam as a moral and political
force not only in India but in the whole of Asia rested on the organization of the Muslims
of India led by the Quaid-i Azam.
The "Guide of the Era" Iqbal had envisaged in 1926, was found
in the person of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The "Guide" organized the Muslims of India
under the banner of the Muslim League and offered determined resistance to both the Hindu
and the English designs for a united Hindu-dominated India. Through their united efforts
under the able guidance of Quaid-I Azam Muslims succeeded in dividing India into Pakistan
and Bharat and achieving their independent homeland. As observed above, in Allama Iqbal's
view, the organization of Indian Muslims which achieved Pakistan would also have to defend
other Muslim societies in Asia. The carvan of the resurgence of Islam has to start and
come out of this Valley, far off from the centre of the ummah. Let us see how and
when, Pakistan prepares itself to shoulder this august responsibility. It is Allama
Iqbal's prevision.
No comments:
Post a Comment